Some people believe that one of the best ways to solve environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Indeed, most people use vehicles that require fuel to work. Nowadays, increasing fuel costs wouldn't be adequate to solve environmental issues since the community would continue using primary and faster transport.
In addition
, other reasons are included for the ecological unbalance, Linking Words
such
as the deforest, Agropecuario, humans, etc. Linking Words
Thus
, I strongly disagree with Linking Words
this
trying solution.
Linking Words
First
of all, the car's engines have been changed to hybrid and electric cars, which helps solve some of the issues. Said that, would be a good action by the factors to reduce the price of these types of vehicles. Linking Words
Additionally
, more encouragement through some Public Policies made by the government and businesses with multimedia marketing to society starting to ride bikes, take the bus, or walk to their destinations Linking Words
instead
of using the car. Linking Words
Second
, a clear example that increasing fuel prices may not work is represented by the war between Russia and Ukraine, where the public continued filling their gas transport; Linking Words
instead
, they only complained about the high costs.
Linking Words
Furthermore
, the high demand for meat, eggs, and dairy products humans has been contributing to the increase in deforestation. Linking Words
Thus
, with plain land, the farmers or factories can raise more farm animals, like cows, goats, pigs, and chickens. These animals Linking Words
also
pollute the land, rivers, and air on a large scale. Linking Words
On the other hand
, another problem starts with the pollution everyone makes every day by not throwing the trash properly. Linking Words
This
action impacts the whole cycle of nature and increases an environmental imbalance.
In general, changing other sectors of life, Linking Words
such
as changes in vehicle engines and ecological reeducation, would help Mother Nature not to collapse in the future. In return for significant changes, the populations on Earth could start being healthier, and they should have more growth and a wider community.Linking Words
Submitted by deboranascsant on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.