Some people think that government spending on the restoration of old buildings in cities should be stopped. Instead they should spend the money for housing and road development. To what extent do you agree?

The housing community is a very serious and complex topic that will have different approaches in all kinds of locations.
For example
, ingrown economies with high ,GDP it is common that people would have a better chance to have a place to live,
instead
, in emergent countries is much more difficult for the population to afford to live in good conditions because the minimum wage of the people is very low. The idea of restoration of old
buildings
is cool and must be done, but only if it is being done with a large study of the local community to analyse all the pros and cons and even the cost of opportunity of constructing houses for the homeless. In the central area of São Paulo is common to have old equity which is mostly cultural and tourist places, these
buildings
attract people to see them and
this
benefits the local economy of São Paulo.
This
cycle should allow the government to use these resources to provide the state with a better life quality
such
as building homeless new houses or road development.
Unfortunately
Add a comma
,Unfortunately
show examples
it is not what happens in most applied cases because the governments are not always clear about what they do with the taxes paid by the population so it is I would say that restoring
buildings
is part of a preservation system that allows
buildings
to stay longer operating and not getting obsoleted so fast. ,
Unfortunately
Add a comma
,Unfortunately
show examples
it is not what happens in most applied cases because the governments are not always clear about what they do with the taxes paid by the population so it is I would say that restoring
buildings
is part of a preservation system that allows
buildings
to stay longer operating and not getting obsoleted so fast.
Submitted by miro.rados on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: