Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others think that the circumstances of a crime, and the reason for committing it should be considered when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both views.

Nowadays, there are lots of crimes happening in our world. some folks have thought that there should be the same judgements for every sort of violation. And another part of society has another view which is the background of the issue, and the cause for doing it should be taken when issuing the judgement.

This

essay will discuss

both

views.

Firstly

, applying fixed punishments for every type of

crime

is not fair, because it is known that, each

crime

has won reasons.

For example

, if

someone

killed

someone

and another

one

does the same

crime

, naturally, the background of

both

crimes is different. The

first

killer maybe he trying to protect himself.

In addition

, if the government fix the retribution according to a type of

crime

,

this

will encourage bad people to do the

crime

.

Moreover

, if there are two persons, the

first

one

stoles 100$ and the

second

one

stoles 1000$ in

this

case

both

of them will have the same punishments because

both

of them are committing the same type of

crime

. The

second

view, is retribution according to the criminal background.in

this

way, each

one

will get fair.

For instance

, if

someone

stoles shop in order to feed himself because he does not have money.In

this

case, there is a reasonable reason why he did that.On the opposite, if

someone

did the same case for fun, of course, the punishment should be different. In conclusion, there are reasons and logic behind

both

views.In my ,opinion

both

views can be considered and that depends on the government.