Some people believe more actions can be taken to prevent crime, while others think that little can be done. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

With the advent of technological advancements, the ballpark figures for crimes are increasing day by day. Nowadays, some people are inclined towards the idea of taking more strict actions against crimes, to make society safer. Whereas,

on the other hand

, other individuals are completely against the above viewpoint. In

this

essay, we are going to look at both sides of a coin.

To begin

, in

this

contemporary civilization, the smidgen of the crowd is on par with the idea of not taking extra precautions against felonies. One of the most prominent reasons behind

this

is, the government needs to allocate more financial resources to the prevention of misdeeds.

As a result

, other imperative sectors’ budgets could be hampered, which can lead to an imbalance between different types of sectors.

Additionally

, if the government imposes strict rules

then

the community’s living environments will be tense. Eventually, frustration will be raised amongst the public due to the lack of liberty.

For Instance

, to prevent misconduct, the Pakistan government placed some difficult rules in the year 2017.

Consequently

,

this

situation led to some catastrophic outcomes as Pakistan’s crowd was feeling like down into the dumps due to the scarcity of freedom.

Hence

, sometimes placing stricter rules to avert atrocity numbers, could lead to some ineluctable outcomes. Paradoxically,

on the other hand

, the rest of the culture, including myself, is convinced by the idea of taking more action against the number of delinquencies.

This

could be explained by the fact that strict steps against

crime

will result in a safer public.

Moreover

,

this

will engender a healthy environment to live in, which is the most paramount factor for the public. On top of that, a secure nation with less

crime

rate will attract numerous foreign tourists, which is the most important factor to uplift a nation's economy.

For example

, a study was conducted by YALE university in 2011, on some of the developing

countries

such

as India and Australia, to find out why their economies rose out of the blue. The results flabbergasted scientists as the study outlined that both

countries

successfully took some serious actions to reduce the number of crimes, which attract foreigners to visit their

countries

. Both

countries

' tourism sectors gained popularity, which helped nations to improve their economies.

Thus

, it is imperative to take some colossal steps against the

crime

rate. In a nutshell, some critics might argue that more actions to prevent

crime

will require more financial resources.

However

, I beg to differ as strict steps to halt evil are necessary because

this

will alleviate society’s living conditions.