Some people believe citizens should be allowed to carry handguns in order to protect themselves, while others think this can lead to many social security problems in the society.What's your opinion? Use specific reasons to support your answer.

In many countries, laws are quite flexible to let ordinary individuals carry firearms

while

in many other

countries

Add a comma

countries,

show examples

it is quite hard to get a license, even for a notable person, to own a

gun

.It is often said that when a state or

country

allows its citizens to carry weapons, the

crime

and

violence

rates increase there and I quite agree with

this

statement.

First,

guns

are meant to

shot

Wrong verb form

shoot

show examples

someone either to wound or kill him.

Thus

the very objective of a

gun

is to kill a person and

thus

this

deathly weapon can only increase

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

crime

and

violence

in a society.To understand how the mass ownership of

guns

can increase the

violence

in a

country

we can compare a

country

like the USA, where carrying a

gun

is allowed, with a

country

like Japan, where it is restricted.

Second,

research indicates that owning and carrying a

gun

can psychologically affect our behaviours and

thus

people often commit crimes only because they have

guns

with them, especially where people can carry

guns

with them, and the only way to reduce

such

crime

rate is to restrict the ownership of

guns

. In conclusion, the only reason the authority would permit someone to carry a

gun

is to ensure the safety of

this

person.

However

, the reality is quite contrary and allowing people to carry

guns

is actually letting criminals

also

won

Wrong verb form

win

show examples

it, it would significantly decrease

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

crime

and

violence

.