Some people believe that children’s leisure activities must be educational, otherwise they are a waste of time. Do you agree or disagree? Give reason for your answer and include any relevant example from your experience.

A lot of people opined that if

children

's playtime is not education-oriented

then

it is a share waste of

time

. I strongly disagree with

this

view for a few cogent reasons.

This

essay will not only elaborate on these reasons but will

also

back them up with some important examples.

Firstly

, non-educational

children

's leisure is in fact one of the most productive ways to help relieve them from

school

work.

That is

,

although

there may be other ways to cool

children

off educational work, playtime is key.

For instance

, many schools have incorporated break

time

in their curricula because of how critical it is for

children

to take a rest from academics.

This

moment is not only available for lunch or a meal but most importantly to do other activities apart from studying. A recent high

school

study shows that

children

's participation in non-academic leisure activities boosts their IQ

hence

reflecting in-class performances.

Secondly

, non-academic play

time

helps foster a social bond among

school

children

. Meaning that students find that opportunity to mingle with themselves, to play and gist,

as a result

, creating bonding and friendship.

For example

, in 2022, in the US, high

school

girls' leading source of learning and sharing of sexual and reproductive health information was peer group discussions as reported in a health journal. In summary, the opinion that

children

's leisure

time

must be educational is unwelcoming and harsh based on a few examples stated above. In spite of any reason they might have for

this

, I am strongly against

this

view and in fact, I believe that playtime should

further

be encouraged not only in primary

school

but at every level of education.