Some experts suggest people a method to solve the environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel and all vehicles. To what extent do you agree with this point? And make comparision where relevant

It is suggested by experts that the cost of

fuels

Fix the agreement mistake

fuel

show examples

and all vehicles should be increased in response to the increasing severity of environmental problems. As far as I am concerned, I tend to believe

this

method definitely can benefit the whole society while potential negative influences

bring

Change the form of the verb

brought

show examples

about by

this

can not be ignored. On the one hand, it is obvious that increasing the cost of

fuel

and all vehicles can resolve the issue of environmental preservation to some extent.

Firstly

, with the increasing

price

of

fuel

, working

people

who usually drive private

cars

to commute between workplaces and home will be more likely to take public

transport

alternately.

Therefore

, the exhaust gas released by private

cars

will be reduced, which somehow is a way to respond to

air

Correct article usage

the air

show examples

pollution issue.

Secondly

, the adjustment of

car

prices will potentially influence individuals' determination on purchasing a

car

. If they figure out the

price

of owning a

car

and additional expense is much more expensive than taking public

transport

, they would more likely to choose public

transport

such

as trams, and buses, in order to avoid additional expenditure. And

as a result

, fewer

cars

running on roads means less exhaust air release.

On the other hand

, the disadvantages of increasing

fuel

costs and vehicles

price

cannot be ignored. The main reason for

this

view is that

this

kind of method will potentially lead

people

who regarded private

cars

as a must to experience financial burden, especially for those working individuals who live far away from workplaces and earn

low

Add an article

a low

show examples

income, as their disposable income is limited. Another reason for

this

view is that it is a fact that

people

who owned

cars

already will still choose to commute by

car

if the adjusted

fuel

price

is still affordable. As they have already gotten used to commuting by

car

and insist on it, and

as a result

, it does not make any difference to

this

group of

people

To sum up, I tend to believe

this

method is a feasible solution in response to air pollution.

However

, some

people

will disadvantage from it and other appropriate methods

such

as subsidising

people

to take public

transport

and hybrid

cars

users would probably be an alternative in responding to

this

topic.