Some experts suggest people a method to solve the environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel and all vehicles. To what extent do you agree with this point? And make comparision where relevant
It is suggested by experts that the cost of
fuels
and all vehicles should be increased in response to the increasing severity of environmental problems. As far as I am concerned, I tend to believe Fix the agreement mistake
fuel
this
method definitely can benefit the whole society while potential negative influences bring
about by Change the form of the verb
brought
this
can not be ignored.
On the one hand, it is obvious that increasing the cost of fuel
and all vehicles can resolve the issue of environmental preservation to some extent. Firstly
, with the increasing price
of fuel
, working people
who usually drive private cars
to commute between workplaces and home will be more likely to take public transport
alternately. Therefore
, the exhaust gas released by private cars
will be reduced, which somehow is a way to respond to air
pollution issue. Correct article usage
the air
Secondly
, the adjustment of car
prices will potentially influence individuals' determination on purchasing a car
. If they figure out the price
of owning a car
and additional expense is much more expensive than taking public transport
, they would more likely to choose public transport
such
as trams, and buses, in order to avoid additional expenditure. And as a result
, fewer cars
running on roads means less exhaust air release.
On the other hand
, the disadvantages of increasing fuel
costs and vehicles price
cannot be ignored. The main reason for this
view is that this
kind of method will potentially lead people
who regarded private cars
as a must to experience financial burden, especially for those working individuals who live far away from workplaces and earn low
income, as their disposable income is limited. Another reason for Add an article
a low
this
view is that it is a fact that people
who owned cars
already will still choose to commute by car
if the adjusted fuel
price
is still affordable. As they have already gotten used to commuting by car
and insist on it, and as a result
, it does not make any difference to this
group of people
To sum up, I tend to believe this
method is a feasible solution in response to air pollution. However
, some people
will disadvantage from it and other appropriate methods such
as subsidising people
to take public transport
and hybrid cars
users would probably be an alternative in responding to this
topic.Submitted by yawenou07089 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.