Some experts suggest people a method to solve the environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel and all vehicles. To what extent do you agree with this point? And make comparision where relevant

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
It is suggested by experts that the cost of
fuels
Fix the agreement mistake
fuel
show examples
and all vehicles should be increased in response to the increasing severity of environmental problems. As far as I am concerned, I tend to believe
this
Linking Words
method definitely can benefit the whole society while potential negative influences
bring
Change the form of the verb
brought
show examples
about by
this
Linking Words
can not be ignored. On the one hand, it is obvious that increasing the cost of
fuel
Use synonyms
and all vehicles can resolve the issue of environmental preservation to some extent.
Firstly
Linking Words
, with the increasing
price
Use synonyms
of
fuel
Use synonyms
, working
people
Use synonyms
who usually drive private
cars
Use synonyms
to commute between workplaces and home will be more likely to take public
transport
Use synonyms
alternately.
Therefore
Linking Words
, the exhaust gas released by private
cars
Use synonyms
will be reduced, which somehow is a way to respond to
air
Correct article usage
the air
show examples
pollution issue.
Secondly
Linking Words
, the adjustment of
car
Use synonyms
prices will potentially influence individuals' determination on purchasing a
car
Use synonyms
. If they figure out the
price
Use synonyms
of owning a
car
Use synonyms
and additional expense is much more expensive than taking public
transport
Use synonyms
, they would more likely to choose public
transport
Use synonyms
such
Linking Words
as trams, and buses, in order to avoid additional expenditure. And
as a result
Linking Words
, fewer
cars
Use synonyms
running on roads means less exhaust air release.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, the disadvantages of increasing
fuel
Use synonyms
costs and vehicles
price
Use synonyms
cannot be ignored. The main reason for
this
Linking Words
view is that
this
Linking Words
kind of method will potentially lead
people
Use synonyms
who regarded private
cars
Use synonyms
as a must to experience financial burden, especially for those working individuals who live far away from workplaces and earn
low
Add an article
a low
show examples
income, as their disposable income is limited. Another reason for
this
Linking Words
view is that it is a fact that
people
Use synonyms
who owned
cars
Use synonyms
already will still choose to commute by
car
Use synonyms
if the adjusted
fuel
Use synonyms
price
Use synonyms
is still affordable. As they have already gotten used to commuting by
car
Use synonyms
and insist on it, and
as a result
Linking Words
, it does not make any difference to
this
Linking Words
group of
people
Use synonyms
To sum up, I tend to believe
this
Linking Words
method is a feasible solution in response to air pollution.
However
Linking Words
, some
people
Use synonyms
will disadvantage from it and other appropriate methods
such
Linking Words
as subsidising
people
Use synonyms
to take public
transport
Use synonyms
and hybrid
cars
Use synonyms
users would probably be an alternative in responding to
this
Linking Words
topic.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • emissions
  • renewable energy
  • public transportation
  • alternative energy
  • economic impact
  • regressive measure
  • social mobility
  • incentives
  • green technology
  • consumption
  • environmental impact
  • commute
  • stricter regulations
  • disproportionately
  • sustainability
What to do next:
Look at other essays: