International tourism is now more common than ever before. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not. What are your opinions on this?

It is increasingly common that global tourism has risen in popularity these days.

While

some people feel that

this

trend brings more drawbacks, I would agree with those who argue that it is a positive move

due to

its contribution to developing

countries

' economic systems. Considering

firstly

the negatives, those who believe that multinational travel is negative might argue that

this

kind of enjoyment might damage nature.

This

is because the development of services to serve tourists often requires people to trade off natural resources.

For instance

, building a five-star resort necessitates an enormous area of forest to be cleared.

Furthermore

, heavily focusing on tourism can create economic imbalance. Farmers,

instead

of taking care of their land, are now spending their time working as tour guides.

However

, my view is that

this

movement is advantageous

due to

the hard currencies it brings to host

countries

. The reason for

this

is that host nations are usually developing

countries

which have economies that depend a lot on foreign tourists, who often reside in wealthy nations.

For example

,

Everest

Correct article usage

the Everest

show examples

hiking expedition has been the lifeblood of Nepal.

Besides

this

, international tourism

also

offers a way for prosperous

countries

to invest in poorer ones. If

this

had not happened, the developing world would not have an efficient path to tackle poverty. In conclusion,

although

there are disadvantages associated with the commonness of international travel,

such

as eroding the environment and impacting the balance of economies, I firmly believe that the benefits of more vigorous economic development and investment outweigh these drawbacks.