‘Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity.’ How far do you share this viewpoint?

Some argue that it is necessary for people to donate a certain amount of

money

they earn to support

charity

. It seems to me that giving

money

to those in need is not the prime way to help them and I will explain why in

this

essay.

Firstly

,

charities

often target symptoms, not causes. It might be true that

charity

helps the recipient with their problem;

however

, it does not do much to deal with the causes of the problem.

For instance

, there is a shocking fact that some children are being trafficked away from their parents with promises of education to fake orphanages, where managers fundraise

money

to earn a profit. A second negative factor is that

charities

are more likely to exacerbate poverty. By

this

Add a comma

this,

show examples

we mean that

charity

tends to make its receivers more indolent since they are provided for what they need without any hard work. Some even prefer

lean

Fix the infinitive

to lean

show examples

on

charities

to make

money

on their own.

Finally

, the government is still spending a fixed amount of our taxes on

charity

at some point.

Therefore

, we do not have to worry about

charities

and just need to pay tariffs as usual for the sake of our society. It is true that there are some positives to

charity

, most notably the pleasure of helping others.

Although

,

charity

may not provide the solution to issues

such

as poverty and unemployment. In conclusion,

charities

are often a short-term fix and

also

impacts

Correct subject-verb agreement

impact

show examples

indigence negatively.

Furthermore

, the government usually takes

matter

Fix the agreement mistake

matters

show examples

into its own

hand

Fix the agreement mistake

hands

show examples

. So giving

money

to support

charities

is not an adequate option sometimes. In spite of that, we can offer our time and talent to

charity

.