Zoos are inhumane and pointless. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

While every major city in the world possesses a zoo,

zoos

have been always seen by some activists and institutions as harmful and abusive. The argument about

zoos

is one I am in favour of. Some of my arguments are as follows. One advantage of putting

animals

in captivity is keeping them away from overhunting.

This

is because, in parks where natural habitat is simulated and healthy nutrients are provided,

animals

tend to reproduce inordinately.

For instance

,

zoos

all over China have played a vital role in doubling the number of pandas and eventually, some of them were returned to their natural habitats maintaining the eco-diversity. Whereas, in national hedged parks pandas’ life expectancy has doubled.

Furthermore

, National parks contribute to raising younger generations’ awareness about the dangers facing endangered

animals

.

For example

, Giza national park provides weekly interactive lectures that teach kids about hazards facing

animals

such

as hunting and severe habitat destruction. As a consequence of similar institutional roles, in the long run, hunting

that is

overviewed as a masculine and mature act will decline.

Although

hedged captivities have social and ecological advantages, many

zoos

in less developed countries have contributed to screwing

animals

’ health, selling endangered

animals

on the black market and leaning

animals

into cities. I believe that governments should regulate the workflow in deteriorated

zoos

.

Furthermore

,

zoos

should not supersede the

animals

’ natural habitats. To conclude, I believe that

zoos

' advantages certainly outweigh their drawbacks. Because they play a major role in maintaining the endangered

animals

’ existence and raising social awareness.