All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?

Electrical vehicles should replace the ones that burn fossil fuels and must put restrictions on using other

cars

. Electrical

cars

are economical, and all other

cars

burn

fuel

and create harmful byproducts, that’s why I completely agree with

this

view. Electrical vehicles are economical as they consume less

fuel

than other automobiles,

In other words

, If I

use

a car other than Electrical it will consume lots of

fuel

which is so expensive nowadays,

however

, if I have

an

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

electrical that can save me money and they are eco-friendly too. In

this

world, where everything is expensive, you can save money which is a great benefit, and with

this

, you can

also

save your environment.

For example

, In the US people, spend their one-fifth of money using transport and if they

use

an Electrical car they can save up to 1000$ per month.

Fuel

cars

are harming the environment as they burn fossil fuels. Burning

fuel

creates harmful by-products, like nitrogen dioxide, carbon dioxide, hydrocarbon, and other products.

In addition

, vehicles emit carbon dioxide which is the most effective human-caused greenhouse gas and we can reduce it by not using

fuel

cars

instead

of that we can

use

Electrical

cars

,

For example

, In Pakistan, the government imposed more tax on

fuel

cars

so the public can

use

more Hybrid

cars

. In conclusion, I agree with the opinion that

fuel

cars

should be banned as they are very harmful to the environment and Electrical

cars

should replace them because they are eco-friendly and consume less

fuel

.