All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?

Electrical vehicles should replace the ones that burn fossil fuels, and

fuel

cars

should be banned. Electrical

cars

are economical and

fuel

cars

create harmful by-products, that’s why I completely agree with

this

view. Electrical vehicles are reasonable, as they consume less

fuel

than other automobiles.

In other words

, If I

use

a car other than Electrical, it will consume a lot of

fuel

which is so expensive.

Therefore

, if I am using an electrical that can save me money, they are eco-friendly too. In

this

world, where everything is expensive, if you can save your money

then

it is a great benefit, and with

this

, you are

also

saving your environment.

For Example

, In the US, people spend one-fifth of their money using transport and if they

use

Electrical

cars

they can save up to 1000$.

Fuel

cars

are harmful to the environment as they burn

fuel

. Burning

fuel

creates harmful by-products like nitrogen dioxide, carbon dioxide, hydrocarbon, and other products.

In addition

, vehicles emit carbon dioxide which is the most effective human-caused greenhouse gas and we can reduce it by not using

fuel

cars

instead

of that we can

use

Electrical

cars

.

For Example

, In Pakistan, the government imposed more tax on

fuel

cars

so the public can

use

more Hybrid

cars

. In Conclusion, I agree with the opinion that

fuel

cars

should be banned, as they are very harmful to the environment and Electrical

cars

should replace them because they are eco-friendly and no

fuel

is required.