Schools are no longer nescessary because children can get so much information available through the internet, and they can study just well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

It is often considered that adolescents do not need

school

learning

hence

all the information is available from online sources.

Thus

I dissent from the notion which

further

leads to a logical conclusion.

To begin

with, classroom education is crucial for students because the

school

environment provides manyfold amenities which enhance personal development

skills

.

Furthermore

, the internet is a solitary thing which provides all-around information but could not enhance personal values.

Moreover

, offline classes provide competition between students which develops the learning values and experience of facing problems.

For example

, In Delhi, numerous students seek distance learning programmes to crack the competition but educatees found it difficult because their doubts were not cleared properly

also

they face a struggle in understanding due to weak internet connection. Probing ahead, online reports can mitigate your doubts despite understanding lectures.

However

, parents' primary choice is

school

learning which enhances children's morals.

Therefore

, face-to-face interaction is necessary for educational knowledge.

Although

, in ,

school

various cultural activities and events are highly beneficial for young kids because they develop an interest in children to show their

skills

in enormous fields. In fact, classroom study will enhance your score in all subjects but online found it is very difficult to gain better marks.

For instance

, youngsters learning from the internet have fewer interpersonal

skills

as compared with

school

-learning teenagers. In a nutshell, classroom education is indeed for young ones to consolidate their

skills

in various fields.

In other words

, interacting with

school

teachers will enhance confidence as well as you learn from your mistakes.