Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attraction. To what extent do yo agree or disagree with this opinion?

The cultural and historical identities

such

as ancient pagodas or buildings are invaluable landmarks for its local people. I strongly disagree with those who think that foreign visitors should be more intrigued by cultural and historical attractions than

oneslocal

Correct your spelling

one local

ones local

, and

this

essay will explain why.

First

of all, a

country

's finances somehow depend on the revenue from travel and tourism. In Myanmar,

for instance

, Bagan is one of the places for tourist attractions throughout the

country

. During the past decade, the rate of tourists visiting that place was significantly soared and

as a result

, the city is developing in every aspect compared to the rest of the cities around the

country

.

Hence

, in return, the locals have to maintain their culture and look after the ancient building from accidental damages caused by the tourists. In

this

way, they can earn more foreign income from the hotels and tourism sector in future and develop the rural areas gradually.

Furthermore

, the rate of jobless could be reduced.

However

, some people argue that foreign visitors should pay more attention to those cultural and historical monuments than the local people. It might be, I would say, the fact that the locals and the government lack knowledge in maintaining those kinds of things or places. In conclusion, the government of a particular

country

should invite foreign professionals to protect those that are at high risk of extinction not only for the

next

generations but

also

for the sake of human beings.