Fossil fuel (e.g. coal, oil and gas) are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative sources of energy (e.g. wind and solar) have been encouraged for use by some countries. Is this a positive or negative development?

Most countries still use fossil fuels as their primary source of
energy
today, but some are beginning to push alternate
sources
in order to protect the
environment
and advance humans.
This
is mostly positive in my opinion because learning about
alternative
energy
sources
helps to preserve the
environment
and fosters peace-building among many nations. Admittedly, the development of
alternative
energy
sources
could be very expensive, requiring a substantial quantity of funding and labour for scientific study. Governments with limited resources and those tasked with simultaneously providing for many social welfare programs may find it challenging to afford
this
additional price. The payback period for generating "green
energy
" is
also
difficult to predict because no one is certain how long it will take engineers to create practical ways to use clean
energy
sources
like wind and solar on a large scale. To preserve natural resources and save the
environment
,
alternative
energy
utilization is essential. As we are all aware, fossil fuels,
such
as coal and oil, are frequently non-renewable, and the overuse of fuel resources has had negative effects on the local ecology.
For instance
, innumerable forests have been cut down by avaricious businesspeople in order to explore oil, which will ultimately exacerbate the problem of global warming. Humans are making their
first
efforts to develop environmentally acceptable solutions to the
energy
crisis by researching
alternative
sources
of reusable
energy
.
Additionally
, the pursuit of "green
energy
" can significantly advance world peace since fossil fuels won't be the exclusive source of
energy
for which every nation engages in hostile competition. There will undoubtedly be substantially fewer intentions for conflict if every country is able to supply itself with adequate, renewable
sources
of
energy
. In conclusion, I still maintain that creating alternate
sources
of
energy
would be helpful for both the
environment
and global peace even though the cost may be extremely expensive.
Submitted by 215612999 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: