SOME PEOPLE FEEL THAT THERE SHOUD BE A FIXED PUNISHMENT FOR EACH TYPE OF CRIME. OTHERS FOT THAT THE CIRUMSTANCES OF AN OFFENCE SHOULD BE TAKEN IN TO ACCOUNT WHEN DECIDING ON A PUNISHMENT. DISCUSS BOTHE SIDES AND GIVE YOUR OWN OPINION.

In
this
contemporary epoch, the debate over whether or not
criminals
should be punished equally has become a controversial argument. Whilst some proponents emphasize that general penalties save time and effort, some opponents adopt a diverse stance because there will be no fear among
criminals
. In
this
essay, both views, along with the reason why
criminals
ought to be treated unequally will be
further
elaborated. To embark on, despite agreeing with the view that each accident has to have a distinct penalty, some advocates discern that generalized penalizations allow judges to have free time because
criminals
will be judged spontaneously.
This
means that when offenders commit crimes, there will be a pre-prepared penalty for each one of them, and
this
will be a process that takes no time. An eminent example of
this
is a study conducted by Cairo University which has revealed that having a fixed punishment will ease the flow of cases in courts.
Therefore
, what can be said is that generalizing penalizations will pour into the benefit of the judging process.
Nevertheless
, each crime has its own circumstances, and it should have a different punishment because judging
criminals
according to their actions will generate fear among offenders. In other ,words if potential
criminals
know that they will receive punishments equal to the severity of their doings, they will be more cautious, and they will fear these penalizations.
This
can be witnessed in Egypt where minor atrocities have a totally different punishment from major ones, and
this
dramatically lessens crime rates.
Accordingly
, in a final analysis, various levels of a penalty play a quintessential role in minimizing crime rates. In conclusion, after
this
essay has manifested the above-mentioned points, it can be reiterated that there is a heated debate
over generalizing
Add a hyphen
over-generalizing
show examples
punishments. Eventually, I am convinced that varying penalties is a much wiser decision.
Submitted by ericssonsony551 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: