people say that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see artwork and historical objects by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree?

Art

is an important part of history. I believe everyone should have the opportunity to enjoy

art

in whatever

form

is available. With that said,

Art

galleries and museums should continue their line of work till the end of time and I will provide my beliefs on the matter.

First,

I believe that every medium could inspire people in a different way. If we take away the physical

form

and force everyone to only be able to consume

art

through digital platforms, We might churn aspiring artists from enjoying

art

in its true material

form

. The inspiration a child could take in an

art

trip down to a museum would no longer be viable in the other case.

Second,

If the

art

form

is already in its physical

form

, We should be given the opportunity to appreciate it in its full

form

. If one makes a statue which is made of minerals,

Then

another sculpture should be able to consume it in its full beauty. It doesn't matter how advanced the current technologies are, To my knowledge, there are no replacements for human eyes. In conclusion, I believe there are no feasible ways to replace our current

form

of

art

coverage. I understand the urge to try and digitalize everything, But we have not reached that state yet.

While

there is still a need to try and put everything on the Internet, Some

form

of appreciation is still possible only through having a close encounter. For that, I believe one would never be able to appreciate

art

in its full

form

without being near the masterpiece.