People
have different opinions about the ways to support those who need help; two of which are direct help, offering help and support in the local communities, and indirect ones, taking the form of donating
money
to charitable
organizations
.
Although
there are some benefits to indirect assistance, I still believe it is better to provide help directly.
Some argue that it is advantageous to donate
money
to charitable
organizations
because they believe that the
money
donated to
organizations
like
such
could be effectively utilized for helping
others
.
Such
effectiveness is exhibited through the scale of the charitable
organization
, meaning that the more established it is, the more competent it seems at helping those in need; there
areCorrect subject-verb agreement
show examples
more cumulated wealth in the
organization
that could be useful for operating charitable deeds,
such
as hiring those who know how to help
others
and being able to purchase resources that are necessary for those in need.
Therefore
, because of the sheer scale of the
organization
, those in need would turn to it for help, and
people
who wish to donate but do not have a good
understandChange the form of the verb
show examples
of how charity works would
also
turn to
such
entityCorrect article usage
show examples
and donate
money
there.
This
kind of credibility based on its size encourages
people
to donate
money
to these kinds of charitable
organizations
in hope that they would maximize the potential of the donation in helping
others
.
Others
,
meCorrect pronoun usage
show examples
included,
however
, hold the opposite view of the argument mentioned above because there might be corruption and under-the-table deals involved with the
money
donated within a large charitable
organization
and
thus
impede the effectiveness or even defeats the purpose of the donation. Some
people
could not help but
harborChange the spelling
show examples
some suspicion
toChange preposition
show examples
the possibility of whether corruption could occur over the process of passing
money
from one intermediary to another; even if the intermediaries are somewhat reliable, just how soon
this
money
could reach those in need and whether those in need actually want financial assistance or some other forms of support are questions waiting to be answered.
Thus
, with these doubts in mind,
people
would consider making
directAdd an article
show examples
contributionFix the agreement mistake
show examples
to those in the local community as the least
worstChange the adjective
show examples
option and would gladly do so just to avoid any risks that might be involved in donating to
largeCorrect article usage
show examples
organizationFix the agreement mistake
show examples
.
Therefore
, it is
this
kind of prudent attitude towards those who yearn for help that dissuades
the Correct article usage
show examples
donors from donating
money
to large
organizations
.
To conclude, smaller charitable
organizations
are preferred, seeing as how the possibility
forChange preposition
show examples
corruption I have mentioned in the previous paragraph is inevitable. The ability to critically think about the risks involved and not have blind faith in large charitable
organizations
areChange the verb form
show examples
a must. It is imperative that before choosing which
organization
to donate
inChange preposition
show examples
, transparency is a key indicator that shows that
this
organization
is to be trusted.