In many parts of the world, families were larger in the past because people had more children. Do you think there were more advantages or disadvantages to being part of a large family in the past? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

having a big family was common, In

last

two hundred years ago.

Families

used to tend to believe that when they have more children that will give them a

lot

of advantages.In my opinion, A big family were and is and will be good for several reasons.

Firstly

, Big

families

tend to

last

for several generations.

For

example

, wars killed a

lot

of

people

and

families

who were big and sure will

last

for more years and small

families

disappear quickly.

In addition

, diseases do the same effects and even more .For ,

example

Checkbox kill around A Hundred million in 1900. Big

families

were saved and lived longer.

This

is the most advantage that I believe help

people

to live until now. We have to be glad because of what the big family did for us.

secondly

, having many members of

families

lead to gaining a

lot

of economic advantages.

For

example

, if I have many brothers and sisters we can do a

lot

of business together without having

people

in our family .May I can grow vegetables and my family help me by selling them and the others cook them or exporting

this

product outside of our country.The huge income we will gain if we have a big family and fewer work hours we work . To sum up, the government should support

people

to have a

lot

of children and encourage them in any way by setting a law because that will have a

lot

of many political and economic benefits for the country . India

for

example

has the strongest economy due to its population's number.