Some people say history is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that in today's world, subjects like science and technology are more important than history. Disscuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Some

people

believe that learning

history

is essential because it is one of the most important subjects to deliver to young generations at school. Meanwhile, a group of sophisticated communities tend to consider that

science

and

technology

are more crucial and relevant to learn.

Hence

, both critical views should be discussed properly to gain some insights and considerations.

First

, let's break down the main perspective of the community that still supports

history

as the most crucial subject to learn at school. Most of them believe that instilling and embedding the historical background of a nation can strengthen

people

's nationality and loyalty to their country.

For instance

,

people

who have been familiar with their own

history

will always be loyal to their country wherever they are. Despite the promising carrier opportunities overseas welcoming them, they will tend to stay and improve their country's potential. Apart from that, learning

history

is

also

a part of self-discovery, especially in recognising their true identity as human beings. The ancient

world

is the root of how we can perceive the

world

around us and what we should do to deal with it. On the other side, the population who are growing up in a sophisticated or modern society tend to believe that studying

science

and

technology

nowadays is more important and suitable. They see the nature of globalization as the massive growth of the industry.

For example

, the digitalization era has improved a lot and changed

people

with

technology

such

as AI.

Hence

, to be a part of industrial work,

people

should master

technology

and understand how to operate it. To be always relevant with the industrial carrier opportunities,

this

community encourages young generations to learn

science

and

technology

deeper. They try to be realistic since the modern

world

has broken the barrier of every nationhood aspect. They see the

world

as a land of opportunity, so what matters for them is to be adaptive to every progress that the future holds. In my opinion, I agree that the urgency of learning

Science

and

technology

is more crucial because as human beings we must fulfil our basic needs by having a promising job to survive. Learning

science

and

technology

is a key to bridging the gap. Meanwhile, studying

history

is more interpretative and abstract to implement. I don't say

history

is not important, it's more fundamental, but the urgency to learn it is less beneficial. In a nutshell, according to the relevancy of the period,

science

and

technology

are more promising to learn because it guarantees our future.