Some people believe that governments should not support the arts (painting, music, sculpture) and instead support other areas. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
It is suggested that governments should be allocated to finance the development of
arts
,
such
as painting, music and sculpture, rather than other perspectives. I believe that both areas should be supported by authorities. It is imperative for governments to allocate funds to developing other public services,
such
as technology and education. One reason is that technology can provide
people
with more convenient services and a better quality of life.
Hence
, if the government can fund technology,
people
will be able to work from remote fields and land jobs in big cities by using advanced technologies,
such
as laptops and the Internet, which can
also
help the public improve their incomes.
Moreover
, if governments
also
fund education, the public will gain knowledge and skills from schools and are likely
for
Change preposition
apply
show examples
them
Correct pronoun usage
apply
show examples
to land a good job and earn a decent amount of income,
and
Correct word choice
apply
show examples
after having a sufficient amount of money, they can live a better quality of life.
While
funding in other public areas has a wide range of advantages, supporting the development of
arts
,
such
as painting, music and sculpture, has its benefits. It is believed that
arts
can cultivate our creativity.
Arts
from different countries represent their own cultural identities. If authority supports the development of
arts
,
people
will have more opportunities to be exposed to a variety of cultures and understand the differences between cultures,
thus
accepting them.
This
process can help
people
stand in others’ shoes and cultivate empathy.
In addition
, there is no universal standard for judging art, so when
people
have access to art,
which
Correct pronoun usage
it
show examples
can encourage them to think outside the box and develop creative thinking skills.
Therefore
, if authorities funded
arts
areas, the public would have more opportunities to practice creative thinking and apply
such
creativity to their work, which could lead to breakthrough innovations. In conclusion, as discussed above,
due to
their valuable benefits, both
arts
and other public services are worthy of government funding.
Submitted by wly_yanwang on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Ensure that your examples are more directly linked to the points you are making.
coherence and cohesion
Use transition words to better connect your ideas within and between paragraphs.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • cultural heritage
  • fiscal allocation
  • public funding
  • economic stimulus
  • cultural capital
  • philanthropy
  • creativity
  • innovation
  • socio-economic barriers
  • quality of life
  • public services
  • patronage
  • government subsidies
  • arts infrastructure
  • civic pride
What to do next:
Look at other essays: