Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings, while people argue that it is wrong. Discuss both views and give your opinion?

It is argued that people are able to test on

animals

for vital medical search, while other said that

this

work is unacceptable. In my view,

although

this

work is approved by some people for the efficient characteristics of pets, it is necessary the banning animal testing for non-medical products because of lacking morals. On the one hand, there are many reasons why animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines to test the safety of other products.

Firstly

, reliable alternatives to animal experimentation may not always be available. A certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved.

Secondly

, a wealth of medical advances is made with the help of animal research ( new vaccines, treatment for cancer, asthma and HIV). When laboratory mice may be given an illness, people are able to test the new medicine on them, and

then

, the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured.

On the other hand

, it is morally wrong to cause

animals

to suffer.

Humans

have no right to subject

animals

to

this

kind of trauma and the lives of all creatures should be respected. The benefits to

humans

do not justify the suffering caused by

animals

, so scientists should use alternative methods of research.

In addition

, the differences in physiology, genetics and cell structures between

animals

and

humans

invalidate most cures devised by animal experimentation. In conclusion, the use of

animals

in medical research is beneficial to the health of

humans

.

However

,

this

work is lack morals and

animals

have none of the responsibility to suffer caused