Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is true that some ex-prisoners become normal
people
. I completely agree with the idea that ex-prisoners are allowed to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing crimes. In my opinion, teenagers are most likely to listen to a person who has experienced a situation.
Instead
of criticising some
people
after his/her completion of imprisonment, the community should accept the person.
For instance
, individuals go into custody for small accusations,
such
people
have guilt and they try to be good
people
.
Such
folks should be considered for educating the children with valuable lessons.
Thus
, they convey the dangers of committing a crime to youths so that, teenagers get to know the criminal charges of our country.
On the other hand
,
instead
of using criminals to educate the young generation, police officers can be a better alternative. They can tell
students
about what happens to a person who breaks the law and what all criminal charges are present in the law. Police visiting the school may benefit
students
on a personal level as it is coming directly from a higher authority and
students
are scared of police officers. The second option can be that teachers tell children about how to avoid criminal charges and it may be effective. But it would be better if documentary films are shown to
students
. Video effects stay longer with children. In conclusion, I adhere that
people
can change after serving imprisonment and can teach important lessons to a society where they can help the community to avoid crimes.
Submitted by rucha.khartadkar123 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • prisoners
  • rehabilitation
  • recidivism
  • consequences
  • insights
  • deterrent
  • guidance
  • support
  • role models
  • positive change
What to do next:
Look at other essays: