Some people think that companies and individuals, rather than the government, should pay for cleaning up pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is irrefutable that companies,

individuals

Use synonyms

and

government

Use synonyms

all have their own responsibilities in cleaning up the

pollution

Use synonyms

.

However

Linking Words

, the way to involve different institutions or

individuals

Use synonyms

in combating

pollution

Use synonyms

should be different in accordance. In my opinion, charging companies and

individuals

Use synonyms

could have better results than charging the

government

Use synonyms

. Disposal expenses in proportion to the output could raise companies’ environmental awareness. Admittedly, it is inevitable for certain industries

such

Linking Words

as the power industry which is the backbone of the industrial world to generate combustible pollutants in the air or discharge wastewater to the aquatic system.

Nevertheless

Linking Words

, obligations still lie on the manufacturer’s shoulders they should try to find the optimal way of producing to minimize their contamination.

Hence

Linking Words

, if removal costs are imposed on manufacturers, they will be encouraged to lessen their

pollution

Use synonyms

production to pay less money. Monetary penalties could

also

Linking Words

dissuade

individuals

Use synonyms

from polluting the environment.

For example

Linking Words

, being charged for using plastic shopping bags, consumers would consider using reusable shopping bags

instead

Linking Words

.

Consequently

Linking Words

,

pollution

Use synonyms

would be largely reduced.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, these measures could

also

Linking Words

help

individuals

Use synonyms

to reconsider their behaviours and the resultant impacts on the environment, fostering a good sense of protecting the environment.

However

Linking Words

, completely relying on disposal expenses could endanger consumers’ benefits.

Firstly

Linking Words

, when charged a large amount of money, producers and suppliers will increase their product’s price to mitigate the burden of regulatory costs, which shifts the pressure on buyers.

As a result

Linking Words

, the consumers would feel unfairly treated since they seem to be charged twice for the same cause. So the

government

Use synonyms

should be involved in administrating the whole process and

this

Linking Words

comprises the reason why it’s better not to ask them to simply pay for the

pollution

Use synonyms

. In conclusion, the engagement of manufacturers and

individuals

Use synonyms

in cleaning up payments has several positive effects

while

Linking Words

requiring the

government

Use synonyms

to pay for the environmental contamination might not have the planned effect.