Some people think that companies and individuals, rather than the government, should pay for cleaning up pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is irrefutable that companies,
individuals
and government
all have their own responsibilities in cleaning up the pollution
. However
, the way to involve different institutions or individuals
in combating pollution
should be different in accordance. In my opinion, charging companies and individuals
could have better results than charging the government
.
Disposal expenses in proportion to the output could raise companies’ environmental awareness. Admittedly, it is inevitable for certain industries such
as the power industry which is the backbone of the industrial world to generate combustible pollutants in the air or discharge wastewater to the aquatic system. Nevertheless
, obligations still lie on the manufacturer’s shoulders they should try to find the optimal way of producing to minimize their contamination. Hence
, if removal costs are imposed on manufacturers, they will be encouraged to lessen their pollution
production to pay less money.
Monetary penalties could also
dissuade individuals
from polluting the environment. For example
, being charged for using plastic shopping bags, consumers would consider using reusable shopping bags instead
. Consequently
, pollution
would be largely reduced. Furthermore
, these measures could also
help individuals
to reconsider their behaviours and the resultant impacts on the environment, fostering a good sense of protecting the environment.
However
, completely relying on disposal expenses could endanger consumers’ benefits. Firstly
, when charged a large amount of money, producers and suppliers will increase their product’s price to mitigate the burden of regulatory costs, which shifts the pressure on buyers. As a result
, the consumers would feel unfairly treated since they seem to be charged twice for the same cause. So the government
should be involved in administrating the whole process and this
comprises the reason why it’s better not to ask them to simply pay for the pollution
.
In conclusion, the engagement of manufacturers and individuals
in cleaning up payments has several positive effects while
requiring the government
to pay for the environmental contamination might not have the planned effect.Submitted by yangbowen251 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.