In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. Why might this be the case? Do you think it is a negative or positive development?

In some countries, purchasing a

house

is more crucial

instead

of renting a

house

.

This

, in my opinion, results from the mind of the boomer

generation

where every human being should have their own building. It should be viewed as a negative development because it can be harmful to the younger

generation

’s finances. Most of the oldest

generation

may give advice to the latter

generation

that it is beneficial to have our own

house

as a building that can live in forever. It is happen because, at their ages, it is easier to get home because of mostly their salaries are high enough compared to their monthly expenses, so they can save plenty of money. In fact, a lot of houses in cities in numerous countries has owned by the elderly age and even they may have more than one

house

in their country. Unfortunately, young ages nowadays mostly can not afford to buy their

house

and choose to rent a flat because the price of houses is increasing. Unfortunately, they are financially unstable. Renting a

house

is more realistic for young age because they can afford to build for a living and

also

sufficient for their basic necessity

such

as groceries, electricity, internet connection, and so on. And

this

is what most groups did to balance finances. In conclusion, spending money to buy a

house

gives advantageous so we can live in our own home ever after without thinking of paying for the monthly flat bill. Sadly, the young generations

such

as

generation

millennial

Fix the agreement mistake

millennials

show examples

and

generation

Z mostly can not buy

a private houses

Correct the article-noun agreement

a private house

private houses

show examples

, so it is risky for their finances.