Companies should provide sports and social facilities for local communities. To waht extent to you agree or disagree?

Social and

sports

facilities for the local community have paramount value and are the responsibility of the government or affordable

companies

. Preparing housing, healthcare centres and

sports

centres can increase the social and affordable state of society. I agree that

companies

should participate in

this

activity because

this

trend provides more health in the community and creates respect for administrations. Providing social and

sports

facilities is an expensive procedure which is mainly the responsibility of the government. Some

companies

spend their money making hospitals, private clinics, green spaces, and gyms, to make social respect for themselves and advertising.

For example

, when Qatar airways erected a football stadium in Manchester city and took stock of its football club. meanwhile , the price of its stocks increased by 30% and

also

the rate of Manchester city young adults enrollment in the related gyms' clubs doubled

as a result

, the health condition of people raised.

Therefore

, both

companies

and society would gain benefits. Many

companies

produce heavy

pollution

around their factories and buildings which can increase the ailments and

pollution

of water and soil. It is their responsibility to erect crucial infrastructure to compensate for these obstacles. Even their investment in medical research or building hospital and medical care centre is a perfect activity to rehabilitate

this

catastrophe. A clear example is that Nokia company invested 10% of its annual profit in finding new mediation against malaria disease in china where most of its factories were situated.

Therefore

, alleviating their accompanied roles in the

pollution

of

this

country. In conclusion,

Companies

should provide

sports

and social facilities for local communities to compensate for their role in

pollution

and take more respect.