zoos should close as they are prejudicial to animals. what is your opinion?

It is important to consider the major roles that

zoos

hold in society by saving endangered

animals

and keeping biodiversity.

While

some people argue that they have baneful impacts on

animals

´ lives, and

hence

, should no longer be open, others advocate their benefits regarding the protection of uncommon

species

. I firmly believe that

zoos

are useful to protect

animals

and

this

essay will highlight two reasons beyond that. In the first instance, it is undeniable that

zoos

play a vital role in society by rescuing

animals

in danger or injured, which are

then

treated and

lastly

released to their original habitat. A prime illustration of

this

is when sea

animals

such

as whales or turtles reach the sea coast,

zoos

are the main responsible to look after them, treating all the injuries and health conditions, and after being cured, they are released into the ocean. If

zoos

were not available, many

animals

would die after approaching beaches.

Zoos

excel in their job by controlling the

animals

' reproduction, indeed. It has been shown that for certain

species

only a few

animals

are left in the world, so when they are taken into

zoos

, they promote an efficient multiplication of the

species

in order to prevent extinction.

For instance

,

although

there are some varieties of African lions facing the risk of disappearing,

this

is being mitigated by the controlled environment for

further

reproduction offered by

zoos

.

This

would not happen if

zoos

close down and,

consequently

, many

species

would disappear. In summary,

whereas

some people do not see that

zoos

are advantageous, I am a vehement supporter of their existence

due to

their precious job of aiding

animals

in need and sending them back to their natural habitat,

as well as

offering favourable conditions to breeding which helps to avoid

further

extinction.