Some people think that the government should establish free libraries in each town. Others, however, believe that it is a waste of money since the public can use the Internet at home to obtain information. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

In the present world, society has become more inclined towards reading on the

internet

as compared to the past when most folks read books and magazines in the physical format. It is a difficult decision for the governments to take whether to establish free

libraries

in each town or not. I will discuss both sides of the argument and give my opinion on the same.

Firstly

, the previous generations still prefer to read actual books and articles as they are less accustomed to the

internet

.

Moreover

, there is a huge number of reading material

that is

not yet available on the

internet

. To read

such

material one has to go to public

libraries

.

Also

, public

libraries

hold a lot of dated newspapers and historic articles that are great for researchers.

On the other hand

, the

internet

is available at the fingertips of consumers. Younger folks prefer the

internet

for reading as it is time-saving and is

overall

a less headache to search for any material the readers are looking for. A library might not have what a reader is looking for, so in that case, commuting to a library, spending hours looking for the reading material and coming home empty-handed is very depressing.

Finally

, I think the government should not establish free

libraries

in each town because society as a whole now prefers a laid-back approach to almost anything. If something can be achieved sitting at home, it's highly unlikely that someone would disturb their routine and travel to get it.