Never has the topic concerning cultural inheritance failed to attract the public's attention.
, when it comes to whether minority
should be protected with the
's revenue,
hold divergent views. From my perspective, even though the expenditure on protecting minority
might be high, I still contend that the
should take some steps to do so.
It is undeniable that putting much money into the protection of
might not serve its intended purpose but exert some negative repercussions.
with,
measure will aggravate the financial burden of the
. The budget of governments is limited and spending a huge amount of money on preserving the
spoken by fewer
does not seem to be beneficial to the majority. Compared with other issues like education and infrastructure, the funding for saving vanishing
will be less significant.
, it is
likely to increase the cost of communication. A variety of
means more
barriers can be triggered. Since more
are inclined to speak their own
rather than a lingual franca,
, communication between
can be much more difficult. They may need to find a translator for global meetings or when they are travelling to another country, which will be extremely inconvenient.
,
there are some drawbacks to preserving those
, the benefits of it cannot be overlooked. Preserving
only spoken by a small number of
can alleviate the susceptibility to cultural assimilation. It is generally believed that
is an important part of the uniqueness of culture. On condition that the
is not used by the local
, they have the predisposition to be assimilated by exotic cultures and devoid of cultural identity, which might make cultural diversity disappear soon or later.
,
measure is of great educational significance. The minority
convey the wisdom and knowledge of our ancestors. When they are well-reserved, an increasing number of
will have the opportunity to learn about those
, which can help them to explore intangible assets
as historical references and scientific research.
would promote the prosperity of diverse cultures and protect the integrity of history.
In conclusion, the protection of vanishing buildings will not merely bring some merits or demerits. No matter how many financial resources it will need, it is necessary for the
to put it into practice as soon as possible.