All parents want the best opportunities for their children. There are some people who think that schools should teach children skills but others think having a range of subjects is better for a children’s future.

All parents want the best opportunities for their juvaniles. Despite, there is a big social dilemma: there are some individuals who believe that the education should be focused on teaching

children

skills

, and there are others who suggest that teaching a range of

subjects

is better for the

children

’s future. I will explain both views and give my opnion on the dilemma. To start with people who believe in teaching

skills

.

In other words

: numerous humans suggest that teaching

children

skills

will be more valuable for them in the future.

For example

, juvaniles must learn how to cook and to the laundry. In addtion, they will learn more about life in stead of

subjects

that have no worth in the near future. Proponents argue that

children

should learn a variety of

subjects

.

This

is because the

subjects

will ensure them to get a job.

Additionally

, it will help them to make logical choices in life.

For instance

,

children

learn to think in a logical way with

subjects

as Mathematics. From the proponents point of view, it is the responsibility of the parents to learn them about chores. In my opnion, the humans who suggest that

children

should learn a range of

subjects

are right.

However

, I have to agree that teaching

children

about

skills

is important, but not as crucial as learning them about

subjects

in school. The juvaniles will get jobs because of their study and

for example

, not because they learned how to clean the powderroom.

To conclude

, I discussed both point of views and the arguments of the people who believe in

subjects

outweigh the arguments of people who believe in teaching

children

skills