In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sum of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Other believes the money should be spent on improving exisitng public transport. Discuss both views and give your own pinion.

Nowadays, people residing in different nations hold contrasting views about the spending of funds in the
transportation
sector. Some believe that it is essential to invest in new railway projects,
however
, others opine that it is paramount to enhance already established public
transport
.
This
essay will talk about both these views and find out which is the suitable procedure to adopt.
To begin
with, considering the congestion in the cities these days, the development of new railway lines between urban centres is the dire need of the hour. Since the urban sprawl is on a spectacular rise, it would turn out to be a productive outcome if governments spend money on novel projects relating to railways.
This
initiative will prove beneficial for people living in urban centres because they will be able to reach their desired destinations in time.
For instance
, they will not
get
Verb problem
be
show examples
late for their offices and workplaces.
Moreover
, the building of
this
means of
transportation
will have a profound effect on overcrowding cities,
thus
reducing bottlenecks.
Therefore
, spending on railway lines will result in convenience for the general populace.
Conversely
, the capital being spent on already established infrastructure relating to public
transport
will have some productive consequences. When a government takes
an
Correct article usage
the
show examples
initiative regarding the development of new means of
transport
, it requires a lot of manpower and investments.
Nevertheless
, at the same time, they can utilise those workers and money to ameliorate the constituted public transit.
For example
, they can invest in transforming established public
transport
into a high-capacity
transportation
system. That would surely cope with the burgeoning population in the cities.
Hence
, investments in the existing
transportation
system will not prove futile. In a nutshell, even though there are benefits of streamlining trains in an urban centre which is now crowded to a great extent, I believe that it requires a great deal of capital, manpower, skilled personnel and heavy machinery. So, it would be more auspicious if a government plans to restrengthen the public
transport
which is already in use.
Submitted by kamran_lashari81 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Good response to the task with relevant ideas presented coherently. However, make sure to address both views equally and provide a clear opinion in the conclusion.
coherence and cohesion
The introduction and conclusion are well-presented. Work on maintaining coherence within paragraphs by using appropriate linking words and transitions.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • high-speed trains
  • intercity travel
  • carbon footprint
  • economic activity
  • construction phase
  • public transport systems
  • congestion
  • pollution
  • cost-effective
  • infrastructure
  • productivity
  • sustainable urban environment
What to do next:
Look at other essays: