death penality is best way to control and reduce the crime rate to what extent do you agree ?

In recent years, a debate regarding methods to prevent

crime

emerged.

In particular

, some people argue that the

death

penalty

is the most efficient way to achieve a reduction in the

crime

rate. Personally, I think

this

view is incorrect because fear does not resolve the

crime

problem and the scientific community has demonstrated that. In

this

essay, a brief explanation regarding the matter will be given. It is undoubtedly true that the risk of

death

could be a deterrent for some criminals. In fact, many countries still use

this

method to try to control serious crimes and prevent them. Some studies suggest that, in the first years after implementation, the

death

penalty

could have some beneficial effect, effectively reducing the crimes for which it is applied.

Furthermore

, it could be said that the most serious offenders,

such

as terrorists or serial killers, cannot be re-educated,

thus

incarcerating

for

Correct pronoun usage

them for

show examples

life or killing them is the only solution. Given all

this

, it is not entirely inaccurate to say that the

death

penalty

is the best way to control the

crime

rate.

On the other hand

, the

death

penalty

has some detrimental effects that cannot be overseen both morally and practically.

Firstly

, on the practical side, capital punishment is not as efficient as it could be imagined. Researchers suggest that,

while

at the beginning there is a reduction in crimes, in the long period the serious offences grow in number because of the violent culture fueled by the justice system itself.

Moreover

, on a moral side, killing another human goes against the stated mission of justice, the re-education, and puts the government on the same level as the criminals. In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the affirmation that the

death

penalty

is the best way to control

crime

. As stated above, not only it does not work, but

also

it is morally wrong to decide on the life or

death

of another human.

In addition

, the role of justice should be to punish and give the opportunity to change for the better, not eliminate from society non-functional members.