The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

Many

people

believe that it would be more beneficial to have a single world government

instead

of various national leaders for every nation. Despite some obvious disadvantages of

this

trend, I believe that these are outweighed by the advantages. On the

one

hand,

one

of the most evident drawbacks of having

one

authority is that it might result in increased rebellious groups. Specifically, if the

one

-world government is led poorly, and there is nothing on the same scale to counter it,

people

will react in a negative way and fight for their benefits.

For example

,

people

are forced to work a lot and

are

Verb problem

do

show examples

not

received

Wrong verb form

receive

show examples

the economic benefits that they deserve. They will eventually rebel and form groups across the globe to fight for justice.

On the other hand

, I would argue that the benefits are more significant.

Firstly

, being led by a general sovereign entity can increase mutual understanding among

people

. To be precise, the world needs to learn the language spoken by its leader in order to follow the rules.

This

way, the whole country will share the same language, which enables the ability to communicate and create a better flow of information.

Secondly

, a healthier worldwide economy might be formed. When the whole nation is run by

one

government, there will be standardized regulations and compliance standards.

This

will

therefore

avoid unexpected issues that may arise

while

conducting a new business. In conclusion, I believe that having a single authority in the world brings more upsides than downsides.