Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. Do you agree or disagree?

Government

investment in the arts is considered to be wasteful.

Instead

, it should put more money into public services. It's disagreed that the

government

finance only public services. Two arguments with explanations will prove

this

in the following photographs.

Firstly

, when the regime spends more money on

music

and theatre,

this

will improve those fields.

As a consequence

, the country will be more known, and

this

will attract so many companies to invest in

music

and theatre in the country. Which leads to more job opportunities , a better economy and tourism.

For instance

, Lebanon is very known for its nice

music

, and for that reason, popular companies like mbc choose Lebanon to be the place to run their most famous show like Arab idol.

As a result

, numerous tourists will come to Lebanon. In short,

this

ameliorates the country in so many ways.

Secondly

,

besides

its benefits to the economy, it is

also

advantageous to the people. There are so talented people, who found themselves only in the arts. If the

government

won't pay attention to art, many will get lost and can't find their future.

For example

, my friend from school is really talented in

music

and wanted to be a musician one day, luckily, the

government

has opened so many universities, centres, and museums related to

music

. He feels so happy that he can pursue his dreams here. In conclusion, I reiterate that the

government

should pay attention to the arts

due to

the several advantages of

this

on the economy and

also

the talented citizens, it provides a bright future for them.