Rich countries often give financial aid to poor countries, but it does not solve the poverty, so some people think that rich countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than the financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Developed countries have been attempting to resolve poverty, a chronic problem in Third World countries, by offering them financial support.
However
, a growing number of people nowadays contend that it cannot be solved radically in
this
way. Personally, I would agree that only the combination of monetary help and education will give rise to a brighter future in
such
underdeveloped regions. Admittedly, money is recognised as a basic necessity for the survival of a nation, especially in emergent situations. In many areas of the world, perpetual natural disasters and adverse weather conditions hinder the construction of infrastructure
as well as
residential buildings, which
also
makes it hard for residents to seek stable and secure settlements. Where there are devastating catastrophes in the country, financial aids always play an integral role in constructing sanctuaries and providing emergency supplies.
Nevertheless
, monetary assistance itself is a short-sighted approach to guarantee the sustainable development of society,
instead
, schooling should be popularised nationwide in order to fulfil
this
vision. People with qualifications and diplomas tend to have an edge over their competitors in the job-seeking market,
therefore
, the unemployment rate may well be reduced.
Moreover
, the public will receive both academic and moral education, so technological innovations will spring up like mushrooms to improve living standards, and the bulk majority of people can be transformed into law-abiding citizens,
thus
enhancing the
overall
security and well-being of society. In conclusion,
although
financial support can be beneficial for short-term purposes, if any country is really willing to offer a hand,
then
they should focus on the long-term perspective and should provide help in the form of education.
Submitted by SHUYAN WANG on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: