Some feel that movies and tv shows are a good way to study history despite their lack of historical accuracy at times. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In

this

day and age,

due to

technological development, there are many historical documentary

films

which have insufficient precision. One part of our society opines that

this

inaccurate information about the past is efficient for students. I strongly disagree with

this

point of view, because imprecise knowledge from series and

films

can form misunderstandings of history in learners and give them wrong data that they do not need. At the outset, a current number of historical motion pictures provide a range of material for students in order to give them new knowledge, but not all of them are historically correct.

Due to

this

reason, people gain incorrect data and use them inaccurately, respectively.

For example

, graduates of universities have to gather a lot of clues for their reports and presentations, so they need to look for resources

such

as

films

and TV shows.

However

, if documentaries do not have accurate details,

therefore

, individuals will apply them wrongly.

Moreover

, the inexact content of television pictures does not provide a needed history of the past centuries for those who want to study

this

science deeply. Visualization of preceded events contains only fascinating content for entertainment. So anyone who needs the right data should look for other sources like books, articles, and the Internet. For insights, if someone wants to find information about dinosaurs, he needs a book including real facts about those animals. In conclusion,

while

others think that

films

and television shows are precise resources for studying history, I personally believe that they are not because documentaries are created for general presentation and entertainment.

In addition

, they give unuseful and wrong material to those who need facts.