some people argue that the best way to reduce pollution and traffic jams from city centres is to make public transport free. do you agree or disagree?

This
essay will totally disagree with the statement because the most effective methods to mitigate these concerns can be addressed by improving public transport and giving benefits to electric
car
owners. Considering
firstly
how developing public transportation could help
this
issue, many times
people
prefer to use their own vehicles because undergrounds or buses do not run at regular times and often run late.
This
means that if
this
type of transportation were improved to make it run more smoothly and at reliable times,
people
would use it more often.
As a result
, they would leave their
cars
at home, reducing,
therefore
, the traffic jams.
For instance
, recently, when the
last
two new tube lines were built in Lisbon, a significant amount of new monthly underground registers took place. In my opinion, even if the underground was free but still non-reliable,
people
would not use it anyway.
Furthermore
, another measure that could reduce the pollution made by the emission of carbon dioxide from fuel
cars
, could be put in place by encouraging
people
to replace their old ones with electric
cars
.
This
could be effective if the government makes some exemptions for these owners,
such
as
free of charge
Add a hyphen
free-of-charge
show examples
road tax and
car
park fees, and insurance discounts. By doing
this
,
people
would tend to buy more of these petrol-free vehicles, and thereby
this
would reduce pollution.
For example
, when that measure was implemented by the Portuguese state, the amount of electric
car
sales boomed. Even if the tube was free, high and middle-class
people
would still avoid using it, so ensuring that they choose an electric
car
is the best option. In conclusion,
although
some argue that making public transport free of charge can help to reduce pollution and traffic strains, I am a vehement supporter that the most effective way to do
this
is by improving the public transport link and giving benefits to
people
to make them acquire more carbon neutral
cars
.
Submitted by ana.lpsmachado on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Ensure that you thoroughly address the specific prompts and fully develop your response to support your position on the given topic.
coherence and cohesion
The essay demonstrates a good overall organizational structure, but ensure that each paragraph has a clear topic sentence that directly relates to the main argument, and use cohesive devices to link ideas within and between sentences.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • urban sprawl
  • sustainability
  • carbon emissions
  • congestion charges
  • commuter habits
  • alternative revenue
  • mobility
  • public transport infrastructure
  • traffic congestion
  • overcrowding
  • cleaner urban environment
  • economic benefits
  • social inequality
  • cycling infrastructure
  • carpooling
  • maintenance costs
  • accessible transport
  • environmental benefits
What to do next:
Look at other essays: