there should only be one government in the world rather than a nationa government for each country. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

It is argued that

instead

of

one

government for each

country

on the planet, there should only exist

one

to regulate all the nations.

Although

having solely

one

state

to set up all the world´s rules could save pecuniary resources,

this

essay believes that there are more drawbacks because each

country

should have its own politicians in order to address its own particular problems more effectively. Considering

firstly

the perspective of having

one

unique

state

to set up all the policies in the world,

this

could save some

money

for the administration.

This

is because, fewer people need to be employed for these jobs, whether they are politicians or assistants.

As a result

,

this

spare

money

could be used to develop the countries´ infrastructures and improve the people´s living conditions.

For example

, spending less

money

on politicians' salaries could increase the budget to be used to build hospitals in African countries.

However

, I do believe that, in a long run,

this

type of government is not effective. Having said that, I

state

that just by having its own leadership, each

country

can address their own problems effectively. The reason for

this

is that each nation in the world is unique, and it would be very difficult to deal with very diverse situations if only

one

state

existed.

For instance

, if the government´s head office was located in Brussels, they would find it very challenging to address Angola´s social issues.

This

is why I believe that

this

drawback outweighs the aforementioned benefit. In conclusion,

although

avoiding squandering

money

on the politicians´ salaries could be a reasonable thought to have only

one

government for all the world, I am a vehement supporter that each

country

should be governed in a particular way in order to face all the people´s needs and thereby

this

drawback is not outweighed by the former benefit.