Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Many people agree that offering knowledge about many subjects for free is beneficial for everyone.

However

,

this

issue is not entirely straightforward, and arguments can be

also

made against the idea.

This

essay will discuss the debate and give a concluding view. On the one hand, supporters of the idea claim that every individual should access the data in order to expand it.

This

results in the improvement of lots of fields

such

as science and business.

For example

, researchers around the world have a common database to share the results of their surveys, causing people to take

this

as a baseline, and add new research to it,

thus

the development of science.

Furthermore

, every human being has a right to access correct knowledge, resulting in a kind of obligation to share all findings with the world.

According to

many scientific organizations,

for instance

, the findings of studies are not hidable from the public

due to

the ethical perspective of the academic society.

By contrast

, those who oppose the statement highlight the necessity of an extreme amount of effort and money to reach the information. By,

this

we mean that the specialists in some subjects spend many years and sometimes sacrifice their lives to find out significant results, which clearly makes them extremely valuable. That’s why they have a right to demand prizes

such

as financial rewards.

Moreover

, the price of data would be used as a source of

further

investigation which creates an environment for the accumulation of the information.

For example

, if researchers demanded money for their articles, they would invest the income in their laboratories to develop their new studies. In conclusion, I would tend to side with the opponents of the statement. It can not be denied that knowledge takes too much time to find out and needs to be rewarded. It is logical

to conclude

that scientists, business people, and the academic community should not open all information that they have

as a result

of hard work.