Technology provides us a lot of means to communicate. But now that people have the ability to talk to each other in a wider variety of methods, our communication and social abilities have taken a step back. Why does technological advance hurt nontechnical communication? How can we solve the problem?

It is irrefutable that technology has enabled us to communicate with
one
another in several ways, regardless of physical distance.
However
, not only have our social presence and interaction been substantially affected but
also
it has led us to spend less amount of time with our family as well. To tackle
this
problem, the use of social media should be limited and face-to-face
meeting
Fix the agreement mistake
meetings
show examples
should be spurred. A multitude of rationales could be cited why technological enhancement has destroyed social communication,
one
of which would be that it may have a disruptive impact on our interactions. As digital platforms have boomed, many users would prefer to use them to reach out to their acquaintances and even their families as opposed to physically arranging a meeting to do so.
Although
this
would be justified, when either of them is thousands of
kilometers
Change the spelling
kilometres
show examples
far away, it will deteriorate the sociability of individuals accustomed to holding their meetings on a regular basis, irrespective of the distance, as the in-person conversation requires several abilities which are neglected on online
one
. Another reason would be that technology would make us dismissive of our loved ones as we do tend to visit our close family on Whatsapp versus face to face. Numerous steps can be taken to address the problem,
one
of which might be that the time spent on social media as a means of communication should be restricted so that it can be allocated to enrich family ties. As a case in point, iPhone has an option by which you can limit access to social apps. The next solution would be that the onus is on the government to set some encouraging plans to value in-person activities by outlining the downsides of excessive use of telecommunication. In conclusion, technological development has badly damaged our personal interconnection
due to
the given reasons and the trouble could be solved if both consumers and the government pitch in.
Submitted by namvarehsan7 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: