As we move deeper into the third decade of the 21st century, tensions between Western and Eastern
countries
are growing. Some argue that we should redirect funding from social benefits to defence spending, arguing that the
government
has a responsibility to ensure the safety of its
citizens
.
However
, I do not agree with
this
point. Increasing military spending would not necessarily lead to greater
prosperity
, and could even escalate tensions
further
.
To begin
, it's important to recognize that simply increasing financial resources does not automatically lead to greater
prosperity
for a country.
For example
,
while
purchasing new equipment for the army may be important for national defence, it does not necessarily improve the standard of living for the general population.
Instead
, the
government
can create a more level playing field for all
citizens
by implementing effective social benefit
programs
. These
programs
can help provide support for those who are struggling and ensure that everyone has access to basic necessities like healthcare and education. By investing in these kinds of
programs
, the
government
can help create a more equitable society and improve the
overall
well-being of its
citizens
.
Secondly
, increasing military resources can often lead to disagreements between neighbouring
countries
. When one country takes steps to strengthen its military capabilities, its neighbours may feel threatened and respond in kind.
This
can create a cycle of escalation and ultimately lead to a stalemate where both sides are spending a great deal of money on military reinforcement without achieving any significant advantage over the other.
Therefore
, it is often more productive for
countries
to focus on improving their economies rather than their military capabilities.
In the current public debate, there is often an argument that social benefit
programs
make
people
lazy and disinclined to work.
This
has led some to suggest that it would be better to spend
this
money on military or other initiatives
instead
.
However
,
this
argument is misguided. In reality, it is much more effective for the
government
to help
people
return to the workforce rather than simply cutting social benefits. By providing training, education, and other forms of support, the
government
can help
people
gain the skills they need to find good jobs and support themselves and their families.
This
approach not only improves
people
's lives but
also
leads to greater economic growth and
prosperity
for everyone.
In conclusion, it is not true that by increasing military spending, the
government
can ensure the safety of its
citizens
. It may actually trigger similar mobilization in foreign
countries
, resulting in an arms race.
Moreover
, cutting back on social benefit
programs
would not contribute to the general
prosperity
of the country.