Some people believe that unpaid commuting service should be compulsory part of high school programmes. Do you agree or diagree?

It is opined several people's uncharged public transportation should be a mandatory part of high school courses. I partially agree with

this

statement.

To begin

with, reducing the

cost

of commuting for a low-class family is not only improving the quality of life but

also

amplifying their opportunity.

For example

, a historical documentary about China dynasty had once been filmed by tracing evidence throughout the country and win the national film festival.

This

is possible because of the policy supporting young travelling. What’s more, without considering the journey expenses, the students are encouraged to explore the world to broaden their perspective. The more experience they have, unsurprisingly, the more contribution they have achieved.

For example

, the Wright brothers, the ones who invented the first aircraft, get inspiration by observing the trajectory of various birds beyond regions.

On the other hand

, zero charge transport costs, definitely, invite crimes committed by an adolescent.

Due to

the cunning approach of the villain, the children have been tricked to be notorious.

For instance

, young citizen of Europe participates in ISIS to become terrorist. If the

cost

of travelling is hugely cut, the wrong one will have more options to stir illegal activities.

Moreover

, the

cost

of commuting for children will be funded by collecting more taxes resulting in unhappiness and rising expenses for certain individuals

such

as skilled workers and the middle class . In conclusion,

while

the free

cost

of commuting leads to several benefits, there are various disadvantages that tremendously damage society

such

as the increase in crime