Public health is becoming an urgent issue nowadays. Some argue that governments should create nutrition and food choice laws to improve public health, while others believe that it is a matter of personal choice and responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
These days, general well-being has become a public concern. It is believed by many that authorities are entitled to issue
food
-regulating rules in order to ameliorate public health
. However
, others discern that individuals are responsible for their choices
, and they do not have to be obliged to consume certain types of diet. Whilst I firmly believe that governments ought to intervene to a certain extent, I also
believe that citizens have to be at liberty to choose from different options
according to
their health
conditions and appearance preferences.
On the one
hand, one
reason why states should intervene in civilians' food
choices
relates to their power of supervision over various health
-influencing sectors. In other words
, some food
corporations tend to mislead consumers by providing them with illusive images regarding their products as being healthy while
they are loaded with palm oils and refined sugars. Since states are able to censor such
erroneous data, they would be adjusting citizens' options
by discarding such
produce. One
further
reason why governments ought to participate in the selection process is that they are armed with nutrition experts and researchers who are able to provide citizens with the proper and up-to-date options
according to
universal health
organisations and the latest recommendations around the world. In Egypt, for instance
, public education campaigns against the dangers of obesity have been launched which have been based on the latest findings of WHO regarding food
choices
.
On the other hand
, one
evident merit which proves the necessity of personal choices
without governmental intervention relates to medical reasons. In other words
, in certain medical conditions, regularly do patients require a specific style of diet in order to override the complications of such
an ailment. Patients , therefore
, have to adjust their intake and opt for suitable choices
, the thing that cannot be actualized by governmental intervention. An eminent example of this
is diabetic patients who are obliged to cut sugar and carbohydrate intake as their bodies are not able to eliminate simple sugars from their bodies. From a physical perspective, civilians should be given the right to choose their preferable body shape. This
is mainly due to
the fact that what an individual is keen to consume usually reflects back on their appearance and physique. Bodybuilders, for instance
, who choose to have such
an iconic body image opt for a high-protein diet which helps them augment their solid muscles. Subsequently
, any roles may be considered to be a violation of their rights of having a particular body appearance.
In conclusion, despite the previously-mentioned benefits of authoritarian intervention on food
options
, I am convinced that individuals should be given the choice to adjust their intake for health
and preference reasons.Submitted by ericssonsony551 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Word Count
IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.
A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.
Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.