Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a controversy about the method to help the developing world. Some

people

think that financial aid from advanced

countries

is enough.

However

, I firmly believe that providing poorer

countries

with money is a lack to tackle their situations.

To begin

with,

instead

of it, constructing the infrastructure will be more helpful for them. Even though those

countries

get financial support, it will not be meaningful because they do not have the advanced skills and machines to utilize it.

Thus

, they will be able to waste the support without improving their economy.

For example

, developed

countries

can build an airport or a port by using the money they are planning to give. These amenities will help the poorer world enhance its export businesses, alleviating poverty. On top of that, it is essential to educate

people

to escape their poor situations. Even though the

countries

' conditions become better based on the help mentioned above, it cannot be continued without experts who know how to use those facilities appropriately.

Thus

, helping

people

to learn languages and advanced knowledge should occur at the same time. Studies have shown that the biggest difference between those kinds of

countries

is human resources.

While

many professors develop their

countries

in developed ones, only a few

people

have high-level knowledge and provide advice in developing ones. All things considered, financial aid can be a good method to help advancing

countries

resolve their problem.

However

, it is not enough because the ways to use money and maintain it is more important to solve that.

Thus

, to help those

countries

, the rich should provide other kinds of support.