Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a controversy about the method to help the developing world. Some
people
think that financial aid from advanced
countries
is enough.
However
, I firmly believe that providing poorer
countries
with money is a lack to tackle their situations.
To begin
with,
instead
of it, constructing the infrastructure will be more helpful for them. Even though those
countries
get financial support, it will not be meaningful because they do not have the advanced skills and machines to utilize it.
Thus
, they will be able to waste the support without improving their economy.
For example
, developed
countries
can build an airport or a port by using the money they are planning to give. These amenities will help the poorer world enhance its export businesses, alleviating poverty. On top of that, it is essential to educate
people
to escape their poor situations. Even though the
countries
' conditions become better based on the help mentioned above, it cannot be continued without experts who know how to use those facilities appropriately.
Thus
, helping
people
to learn languages and advanced knowledge should occur at the same time. Studies have shown that the biggest difference between those kinds of
countries
is human resources.
While
many professors develop their
countries
in developed ones, only a few
people
have high-level knowledge and provide advice in developing ones. All things considered, financial aid can be a good method to help advancing
countries
resolve their problem.
However
, it is not enough because the ways to use money and maintain it is more important to solve that.
Thus
, to help those
countries
, the rich should provide other kinds of support.
Submitted by eunbi_0915 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • poverty alleviation
  • economic inequality
  • developing nations
  • foreign aid
  • sustainable growth
  • technical assistance
  • expertise
  • infrastructure
  • education
  • fair trade
  • trade barriers
  • sustainable development
  • environmental conservation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: