Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

There exists a debate on whether or not the government should spend money on

railways

instead

of roads.

While

some argue that it is better to spend money on

railways

. I disagree with

this

statement. I personally agree that capital should be encouraged to spend on both building the

railways

and roads. On the one hand, the

train

allows the different communities to build closer and more active communication across the cities.

This

is because the fund spent on maintaining and updating the rail line would be helpful for communicating with people who live in other places.

For example

, visitors who live in city A need to spend 4 hours driving to city B,

while

taking the

train

, only costs 1.5 hours or less in general.

Therefore

, enhancing the

train

system might attract tourists to other places, contributing to increasing communication with different cities. For another, the benefit of updating the

train

lines should not be ignored. Railway systems are well-organised to reduce our time spent on the way. If the inhabitants could have a more convenient transport method with advanced technology, dwellers would find it more efficient to go somewhere far.

For instance

, it is beneficial for visitors or workers on a business trip to take the high-rate rains to other places that are far away from the departures, compared to driving which is under a lower efficiency.

Thus

,

this

system plays an essential role in our business or travel. In conclusion, I reaffirm my position that money should be utilized both in

railways

and roads, it not only eases the local transportation pressure

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

but

also

improve the efficiency of different societies.