Reporting of crimes and other kinds of violent news on television and in newspapers can have adverse consquences. This kind of information should be restricted from being shown in the media. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Personally, I see that there are negative effects that are based on showing crime scenes and harmful pictures on public television, but I disagree with the statement

this

Information would only end in disadvantages, and

therefore

, should not be published. On the one hand, fictional movies that contain an unrealistic storyline of crime and violence might have detrimental consequences. Most of these films are too exaggerated and impulsive

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

and show too much violence that can lead to aggressive behaviour oneself.

For example

, the Marvel movie "Deadpool" shows a tremendous amount of violence happening way too easily, so children could pick up a faster use of that behaviour by watching these movies. Anyhow,

this

kind of film material has a minimal age and parents are responsible to explain their children in the media world.

On the other hand

, news and documentaries have to show the drawbacks of society and life that are happening outside. Topics like rape, murder, harming the environment, remaining

actions

against minorities, and others are not nice to see but needed to be seen. Already too many violent

actions

, for ,example rapes by special persons in public or

actions

against gay or trans people keep being untold. But cases,

such

as the murder of the trans person "Malte"

while

the

last

CSD in Mannheim took place, have to become public so individuals know what to be aware of and change in society. Concluding I think media should be a tool to offer us uncensored information so people get to know the truth, and can choose their

actions

based on that knowledge,

while

it is up to responsible parents to teach their children what is fictional and wrong and what is the bitter truth.