Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
The necessity of conducting extreme
sports
is a hot topic that has been discussed for a long time,
while
some suggest government prohibit
such
events
due to
various safety hazards for human physical health. I am in favour of those opponents who believe the advantages of doing high-risk
sports
outweigh the negative effects, as long as proper regulations are applied.
To begin
with, it is inevitable that extreme
sports
,
such
as boxing; car racing; and gymnastic, could cause physical harm to players. Not only will it lead to irreversible negative results
to
Change preposition
for
show examples
individuals but will provoke burdens in the medical system, the best solution to prevent
such
tragedy happen in the future is to ban all correlative activities.
For example
, many high schools in Taiwan are used to holding cheer dance competitions every year,
however
, after a serious incident happened in the
last
year of the competition which cause a young girl paralysed,
such
events are banned by the government.
On the other hand
, there are various advantages regarding high-risk exercises, first of all, it helps people to release stress and be more positive since people need to focus on the games, which allows them to keep annoying things behind, and enjoy the moment.
Moreover
, many international extreme exercises are popular around the world, and by holding those activities, a nation could gain a great amount of revenue,
along with
it, job opportunities to fulfil growing demand.
For example
, Singapore will hold an international car race called F1 yearly, which attracts thousands and millions of tourists and brings large profits to the local community. Despite
such
occasions containing certain dangers, the safety of players could be ensured by stringent censorship of the equipment they use and regulations for workers to follow. To summarise, it is true that there are various potential hazards provoked by extreme
sports
, which could cause damage to the human body,
however
,
such
events could not only reduce depression but increase the financial situation in the local region.
Therefore
, I personally agree that
instead
of prohibiting extreme activities, authorities should apply the rules as prevention to demolish potential damages.
Submitted by unapoya0916 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • severe injuries
  • fatalities
  • base jumping
  • bull running
  • extreme skiing
  • safeguard
  • well-being
  • regulating
  • avoidable harm
  • healthcare costs
  • burdening
  • personal freedom
  • autonomy
  • training
  • equipment
  • mitigated
  • personal satisfaction
  • mental health benefits
  • resilience
  • adventure
  • assess risks
  • public safety
  • unnecessary healthcare costs
  • outright bans
  • balanced approach
  • stringent safety standards
  • mandatory training sessions
  • adequately informed
  • safeguarding
  • public health
What to do next:
Look at other essays: