The detailed description about crime will affect the people and cause many social resources. Some people say that the media should be strictly controlled. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
Regarding the surge in crime rate nowadays, some blame it on news providers for giving too much
detail
about illegal activities to spice up their articles. Despite such
behaviours could provoke various negative influences in human societies, I hold opponents to stringent censorship of media
, since it gives power to authorities to control public
, Add an article
the public
furthermore
, unclear information
could put viewers in vulnerable situations when they deal with various means of fraud.
To begin
with, it is true that newspapers along with
other media
are in favour of uncovering detail
about how a crime is being done to satisfy the curiosity of audiences. Those
Change the determiner
That information
information
could easily be accessed by young individuals who are too young to tell right from wrong and imitate their actions as entertainment activities. For example
, when a newspaper report a bomb incident, instead
of focusing on the incident itself, the journalist lists all the ingredients to make a bomb, since those subsidences are easy to get, it makes many people
start to try it at home or even use it to break the laws.
However
, stringent regulations to control media
will lead to various drawbacks in societies. First of all, it allows powerful people
to wipe out the voices against them,
and sugar-coated their wrongful behaviour. Take North Korea as an example, their Remove the comma
apply
media
are affiliated with the local government and well known for providing fake news to manipulate residents. Secondly
, a detailed description of current scams could deter potential victims from a great financial loss. For, instance, newspapers in Taiwan will reveal the latest frauds in detail
including how criminals find their targets and get personal details from them, which help people
be more alert when encountering similar situations.
To summarise, media
should be more aware of the information
they provide,
since too much Remove the comma
apply
detail
could derive a rise in population copying the process of those illegal activities, reversely, strict laws to examine the content could lead to more downside, since those with power could benefit from manipulating media
, moreover
, people
are not able to identify the fraud and lost a tidy sum of money. Therefore
I tend to disagree with the perspective of making harsher censorship on information
providers.Submitted by unapoya0916 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.