People from poor and rural backgrounds find it difficulty to get university education. Some people think that the government should make it easier for them to enter universities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Some folk believe that the rule should help folks from poor and rural areas to get tertiary scholarships by making the admission process easier. So , everyone can get a university education and

hence

, anyone can get a lucrative job. From my perspective, I strongly agree with

this

statement

due to

many reasons which will be described in the following paragraphs before the conclusion is reached.

To begin

with, I think that a highly educated population is crucial to ensure the growth and development of the country. If the authority supports students from rural backgrounds to secure university degrees, not only would

this

lead to better careers, but

also

make peoples' standards of living higher. It would result in an increase in the average literacy rate. Based on the aforementioned statements, it is broadly maintained that assisting poor people get a university education brings an advantageous aspect.

On the other hand

, providing opportunities for tertiary education to people who lack funds is a waste of tax money. They think that the authority should invest

this

monetary resource to provide public services,

such

as parks, roads, libraries and public transport.

For instance

, a small garden in every community would be a convenient way for a community that wants to spend time with their families. In conclusion, I agree that the government and universities should introduce students from remote areas and below-average-income families, I believe that entry requirements should be the same for everyone and it is the responsibility of politicians to make it available for all kinds of students whether they are rich or poor.