Many people feel it is a waste of money to try to save endangered animal species, for example, the tiger or blue whale. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

In the contemporary era, governments bear noteworthy expenditures for saving endangered animal

species

. Even the tiger and blue whale among the many

species

countries investing a

lot

.

Nonetheless

, I totally disagree it represents a waste of money. Analysing each

species

important for the ecosystem,

as well as

the extinction of these

animals

would be our fault would prove

this

. To commence with, every animal has its role in the world and losing one of them eternally would bring considerable problems to the environment.

For instance

, Blue Whale poop helps stimulate the growth of phytoplankton which helps to pull carbon out of the atmosphere and create healthier air and water for the

animals

of the earth.

This

information become well-known in recent years

due to

the decrease in blue whales and changes in the atmosphere of the places near oceans.

Thus

allowing them to vanish could bring particular issues for nature.

On the other hand

, it is really hard to believe that caring for endangered

species

could bring economic crisis to humanity. A great example can be the whale-watching industry, In 2008 japan benefitted from 22 million euros.

Moreover

, a

lot

of people worldwide visit zoos to watch various

animals

and

this

could decrease the amount of money which costs from caring for endangered

animals

.

In other words

, if mankind continues carelessness the chance of danger for

animals

could increase because a

lot

of industries men builts are harming the environment and causing the extinction of some

species

. Mankind should take all responsibility and should not avoid to spent on endangered

species

because these drastic changes happening

due to

the impact of men's industrialisation.

To conclude

, many today think caring for particular

animals

costs a

lot

and men should not invest in them. I presume

this

viewpoint is not meaningful because if we lose certain

animals

it could affect the ecosystem and,

also

the number of

species

decreasing because of human influence and taking care of it should be the obligation of humanity.